We are in the process of conducting a Delphi Survey that aims to create a taxonomy of reproducibility interventions and pair them to different stages of the research cycle. The first round of the survey – in a sense – took a step back, aiming at getting input on the activities that comprise each stage of the research cycle and its relevance for facilitating reproducible research practices. The input we received clearly showed that the structure of the research cycle is not clear-cut, the periodization of the research cycle is nuanced, as well as much affected by the disciplinary context. Do you think this is a valid result? Does it reflect reality, in your opinion? Please share your thoughts…